Randomised Control Trials (RCTs) have a narrow scope, restricted to basic intervention schemes. Experimental designs also display specific biases and political uses when implemented in the real world. Despite these limitations, the method has been advertised as the gold standard to evaluate development policies. This paper takes a political economy angle to explore this paradox. It argues that the success of RCTs is driven mainly by a new scientific business model based on a mix of simplicity and mathematical rigour, media and donor appeal, and academic and financial returns. This in turn meets current interests and preferences in the academic world and the donor community.
on the same topicResearch documentpublished on01 Jun 2018Institutional documentpublished on01 May 2018Evaluation documentpublished on01 May 2018Vidéopublished on01 Mar 2018Research documentpublished on01 Oct 2017Research documentAssisting Developing Countries in Taxation after the OECD’s BEPS Reports: A Suggested Approach for the International Donor Communitypublished on01 Jun 2017
from the same collectionResearch documentpublished on01 Aug 2018Research documentpublished on01 Jul 2018Research documentThe Gold Digger and the Machine: Evidence on the Distributive Effect of the Artisanal and Industrial Gold Rushes in Burkina Fasopublished on01 Jul 2018Research documentpublished on01 Jun 2018Research documentThe Gap Between Rich and Poor: South African Society’s Biggest Divide Depends on Where You Think You Fit Inpublished on01 Jun 2018Research documentpublished on01 Jun 2018