Development impact evaluations, and randomised control trials (RCTs) in particular, have boomed since the early 2000s albeit with large differences in growth patterns from one donor to the next. These studies have prompted renewed interest in development economics research and have improved donors’ project evaluation quality standards. They have produced an array of new knowledge, some of which has made a huge impression and fuelled strong policy decisions. Yet this “new” method, which has made something of a sea change to the practices of traditional donors and development partners in general, has not emerged without controversy. Impact evaluations have stirred up heated debate over methods and use in academic and donor circles. This issue presents the state of play with these debates, especially the points of international consensus, and proposes options for a reasonable use of this tool. It also addresses less prominent questions and recommends their inclusion as considerations in the definition of donor strategies.
on the same topicResearch documentpublished on01 Jun 2018Institutional documentpublished on01 May 2018Evaluation documentpublished on01 May 2018Vidéopublished on01 Mar 2018Research documentpublished on01 Oct 2017Research documentAssisting Developing Countries in Taxation after the OECD’s BEPS Reports: A Suggested Approach for the International Donor Communitypublished on01 Jun 2017
from the same collectionResearch documentpublished on01 Jul 2015Research documentpublished on01 May 2015Research documentpublished on01 Feb 2014Research documentpublished on01 Jul 2013Research documentpublished on01 May 2013Research documentManaging food price instability in developing countries - A critical analysis of strategies and instrumentspublished on01 Apr 2013