Despite being generally poorly recognized by public authorities, informal recycling remains nevertheless a major component in the waste sector, which questions the legitimacy of the official waste arrangements. A look at the current transformation in Hanoi (Vietnam), Delhi (India) and Surabaya (Indonesia) allows us to understand the socio-technical aspects of infrastructural choices in the management of waste generated in fast-growing Asian cities. The three cases present similar traditional recycling practices yet contrasted (non-) regulation within their waste policies. From the co-existence of a municipal waste management service with a traditional informal recycling sector, to an opposition between both, there is also a possibility of making use of the existing local practices to achieve a more sustainable system.
on the same regionResearch documentpublished on01 Aug 2018Institutional documentpublished on01 Jul 2018Institutional documentpublished on01 Jun 2016Research documentCreating Alliances to Accelerate Commercially Viable Sanitation - Lessons learned from the toilet board coalition and its market-based initiativespublished on01 Nov 2015Research documentpublished on01 Sep 2015Research documentpublished on01 Nov 2014
on the same topicVidéopublished on01 Sep 2018Institutional documentpublished on01 Sep 2018Institutional documentpublished on01 Jun 2018Institutional documentpublished on01 Jun 2018Vidéopublished on01 May 2018Institutional documentpublished on01 Apr 2018
from the same collectionResearch documentpublished on01 Aug 2018Research documentpublished on01 Jul 2018Research documentThe Gold Digger and the Machine: Evidence on the Distributive Effect of the Artisanal and Industrial Gold Rushes in Burkina Fasopublished on01 Jul 2018Research documentpublished on01 Jun 2018Research documentThe Gap Between Rich and Poor: South African Society’s Biggest Divide Depends on Where You Think You Fit Inpublished on01 Jun 2018Research documentpublished on01 Jun 2018