Today, development actors see urban heritage as a resource for their territory, which is why they need to define its economic value. This evaluation is a delicate exercise as such patrimony is generally a complex reality, consisting of four interdependent economic, cultural, social and environmental dimensions. The methodology for evaluating the economic potential of such heritage as proposed here involves four analytical steps. The first step, identification of the patrimony, cannot be based on an economic approach alone, but combines this with historical and sociological inquiries. Evaluating the services rendered by an urban heritage is the second step. The third step is the pivotal one of the proposed methodology: based on the idea of sustainability — borrowed from environmental economics — investment flows are compared with degradation of the urban heritage. As a fourth step, we introduce threshold effects and the risk of non-sustainability into the analysis. A sustainability grid provides the reader with a visual summary of these four steps in a single diagram.
on the same regionResearch documentpublished on01 Aug 2018Research documentpublished on01 Jul 2018Institutional documentpublished on01 Jul 2018Research documentpublished on01 Jun 2018Vidéopublished on01 May 2018Institutional documentpublished on01 May 2018
on the same topicVidéopublished on01 May 2018Research documentpublished on01 Jun 2017Research documentpublished on01 Jan 2017Research documentWater from the heights, water from the grassroots: the Governance of common dynamics and public services in La Paz-El Altopublished on01 Jun 2016Research documentpublished on01 Dec 2015Research documentpublished on01 May 2015
from the same collectionResearch documentpublished on01 Jul 2015Research documentpublished on01 May 2015Research documentpublished on01 Feb 2015Research documentpublished on01 Feb 2014Research documentpublished on01 Jul 2013Research documentpublished on01 May 2013