This study was commissioned to map and compare evaluation practices across development agencies, primarily with a view to stimulate an internal debate within AFD on its evaluation systems during a time of reform. However, the report can stimulate a wider debate within the development evaluation community as it complements the existing literature on donor policies and the individual case studies of good practice. Nine agencies were reviewed as part of this study. The results show that there is indeed variation among the strategies and practices adopted by different evaluation units, in terms of both internal arrangements and different roles and responsibilities fulfilled.
from the same collectionEvaluation documentEvaluation of the Second Objective of the Biodiversity Cross-cutting Intervention Framework (2013–2017)published in May 2019Evaluation documentEvaluation of the AFD “Protected Area” conservation and development intervention contributions (2000-2017). Synthesis of the final reportpublished in March 2019Evaluation documentpublished in February 2019Evaluation documentpublished in April 2018Evaluation documentpublished in February 2018Evaluation documentpublished in April 2017