In Turkey, the budget support to the forestry sector was subject to an evaluation in July 2018.
The budget support was granted in the context of the opening of chapter 27 of the pre-accession negotiations between the European Union and Turkey. The design of Turkey’s National Climate Action Plan was in the making after the country signed the Kyoto protocol.
The evaluation noted that two out of the three components of the programme lacked relevance as regards the objectives. These two components, funding and policy dialogue, suffered from a lack of clarity regarding the budget support itself and the objectives to be reached. A last minute change of course was not thought through and contributed to a lack of effectiveness of the programmes. The third component, the technical partnership, was however most flexible and effective: it provided new know-how, skills and tools and helped better coordinate the intra and inter forestry sector.
on the same regionExhibitionpublished in December 2019Evaluation documentpublished in July 2019Vidéopublished in December 2018Vidéopublished in September 2018Vidéopublished in September 2018Institutional documentpublished in April 2018
on the same topicInstitutional documentpublished in December 2019Institutional documentpublished in October 2019Vidéopublished in September 2019Evaluation documentEvaluation of the Second Objective of the Biodiversity Cross-cutting Intervention Framework (2013–2017)published in May 2019Institutional documentpublished in May 2019Research documentpublished in April 2019
from the same collectionEvaluation documentpublished in July 2019Evaluation documentpublished in December 2018Evaluation documentpublished in November 2018Evaluation documentpublished in August 2018Evaluation documentpublished in May 2018Evaluation documentpublished in April 2018