There are several approaches to fragile states. The first, based on the crisis cycle, distinguishes between deteriorating countries, countries in prolonged crisis, countries emerging from crisis, and countries showing gradual improvement. The second, advocated by the United Kingdom’s Department for International Development (DFID), is based on the characteristics of the state, and more specifically on the combination of its capacity and its political will to resolve crises and ensure equitable distribution of resources to the entire population.
on the same regionResearch documentpublished on01 Oct 2017Institutional documentpublished on01 Sep 2017Research documentpublished on01 Dec 2016Evaluation documentpublished on01 Oct 2016Research documentpublished on01 Aug 2016Research documentWater from the heights, water from the grassroots: the Governance of common dynamics and public services in La Paz-El Altopublished on01 Jun 2016
on the same topicVidéopublished on01 Mar 2018Research documentpublished on01 Jan 2018Research documentpublished on01 Jan 2018Vidéopublished on01 Nov 2017Research documentpublished on01 Mar 2017Evaluation documentpublished on01 Oct 2016
from the same collectionEvaluation documentpublished on01 Feb 2018Evaluation documentpublished on01 Apr 2017Evaluation documentpublished on01 Mar 2017Evaluation documentEvaluation of AFD‘s Sectoral Intervention Framework (SIF) on Education, Training and Employment, 2013-2015published on01 Oct 2016Evaluation documentpublished on01 Oct 2016Evaluation documentpublished on01 Sep 2016