Indonesia’s commitment to carbon emission reduction is aligned with its global responsibilities under the Paris Agreement. The country is also one of the 52 national jurisdictions in the world that have established carbon pricing regulations (World Bank, 2023). The primary goal of carbon pricing instruments implementation is to support Indonesia in achieving its Nationally Determined Contribution – which are commitments that countries make to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions as part of climate change mitigation.

In this context, the Government of Indonesia intended to introduce carbon pricing instruments on a voluntary basis from 2021 to 2024, with a shift to mandatory enforcement expected by 2025. Despite its modest start, the introduction of this tax marks a considerable advancement in Indonesia, particularly given the few low and middle income countries that have implemented a carbon tax. 

Using carbon pricing as a method to foster a decarbonised economy is a significant policy instrument, yet it can lead to uneven burdens across different societal groups. These measures, while environmentally beneficial, may inadvertently promote inequality. If these disparities are not addressed, the push towards global decarbonation could be hindered, achieving less impact or imposing uneven costs.

Using an analytical tool from Commitment to Equity Institute (CEQ Institute), this research project aims to improve the design of policies that can both deliver environmental goals whilst reducing the distribution burden, by ensuring a just transition.

This research project complements two studies carried out by the EU-AFD Research Facility on Inequalities in collaboration with the Indonesian government on Marine Protected Areas development policies and the production of a diagnostic on inequalities in the country.
 

Find out more about the Extension in Indonesia

The general objective of this research project is to assess the environmental (emission) and welfare-distributional effects (indicators of poverty and inequality) of trading and non-trading instruments (carbon price and revenue). Specifically, the study aims to incorporate heterogeneous cost and impact assessments across the archipelago of Indonesia. 

The study will focus on the impact of carbon pricing and other indirect fiscal instruments (taxes and subsidies) combined with direct taxes and social transfers that can assist in the mitigation of these instruments on welfare distribution and environment.

In order to design more effective policies that meet both environmental and distributive objectives, CEQ Institute has developed an analytical tool using micro data on household characteristics, behavioural science and a data analytical tool known as microsimulation modelling. It is an ex ante planning tool taking micro units, such as households, and simulating policy changes in advance of policy implementation. 

The framework incorporates the following discrete analytical dimensions: 

• Methodological frameworks to model the distributional impact of fuel related fiscal policies;
• An Input-Output framework to track the indirect impact of carbon prices;
• Behavioural implications of alternative environmental challenges using a demand system;
• Identifying just transition solutions using social protection instruments.

The dataset integrates two primary sources: the 2016 Table Input Output from the Central Bureau of Statistics (BPS) and the 2022 National Socioeconomic Survey (SUSENAS). Data and information from the Indonesian Directorate General of Taxes and from various relevant ministries are also used to conduct the study. 

The research paper related to this project is available for download here: Data Analytics for a Just Transition. Distributional Impacts of Environmental Policies (Indonesia)

The study concludes that the success of Indonesia’s energy transition will depend not only on its environmental effectiveness but also on its ability to ensure fairness across different segments of society.

South Africa remains one of the most unequal countries in the world. The country’s high-income inequality is driven primarily by extreme differentials in the labour market, where over 30% of the labour force is unemployed and earns zero income (Leibbrandt et al., 2010; StatsSA, 2024). Reducing unemployment is therefore at the heart of South Africa’s social and economic challenges, and is key to lower the level of inequality. 

Coal is an important industry in South Africa and is central in the just transition. Rough estimates of total employment in the coal value chain alone are close to 200,000 – roughly 1.2% of total employment – while the contribution to output sits at 5.4% of growth domestic product (Makgetla et al., 2021). Moreover, the coal industry is highly geographically concentrated and underpins a large share of local and regional economic activity in certain areas, particularly localities within the Mpumalanga province.

In this regard, the potential negative employment impacts of a transition away from coal, and toward low carbon energy production, presents a significant socio-economic challenge for a country still dealing with the vestiges of apartheid. It is thus critical that the risks associated with these potential adverse employment effects are managed to ensure that inequality is not worsened by an unplanned transition.

Find out more about the Extension in South Africa

This work is also part of AFD's dialogue with the South African authorities on the just transition and the identification of reforms to be implemented to ensure an inclusive transition.

There is currently a limited understanding of how many workers are likely to be affected by a transition away from coal; how these workers vary by age, skill, or income level; what an effective social protection policy package for such workers would involve; how much a given basket of policies is likely to cost; and the financing options available. Yet, these are crucial elements in designing and implementing policies that limit the negative social and economic effects of transition and prevent potential increases in unemployment and inequality.

This project aims to make two primary high-level contributions:

1. First, it will count and profile existing workers in coal and related industries using reliable, spatially sensitive microdata. This includes an analysis of employment, wages, and wage inequality;
2. Second, it will propose a basket of social protection policies tailored to the identified worker profiles, with attendant modelled cost estimates, and potential financing options. This includes a focus on the wage inequality implications of various policy scenarios that highlight the importance of a just transition in South Africa.

The research project has four main components that will encompass the following analytical areas:

1. The utilisation of tax data to accurately identify at-risk employees in coal mining, coal-based electricity generation, and coal-adjacent industries, locating them spatially across the country. This will provide a reliable estimate of the number of direct and indirect coal industry workers at risk of being adversely affected in a shift away from coal.
2. The production of detailed gender, age, and earnings profiles of the identified at-risk workers in the sector. This exercise is anchored around worker earnings and will be used to identify sub-groups, or cohorts, of workers who will require different forms of protection and support based on their existing skills, earnings, and age profile. The earnings data will in addition be utilised to examine inequality dynamics within the coal value chain and between coal value chain workers and those employed in mining generally and in the formal economy as a whole.
3. Using these worker profiles to provide a framework of suitable policy options for the different cohorts in order to develop a comprehensive social protection response. Policy options would include individually assigned combinations of interventions such as early retirement packages, grants, and skills development. Furthermore, the study will provide a comprehensive overview of the various social protection policies available in South Africa and determine whether they could apply to affected workers.
4. Examination of scenarios for declining coal employment and model a series of associate cost estimates for the various policy response options. This includes modelling possible policy scenarios over the full-time horizon of existing employees. The result is a costed picture of the implications of the just transition policy for South Africa’s coal sector, that includes a discussion of potential public finance options. The findings will also shed light on potential inequality outcomes to emerge from different just transition policy scenarios.

The project resulted in two research papers, available below: 

• Counting and Profiling Coal Mining Industry Jobs (July 2025): 

Subcontracted employment within the coal mining industry has grown, now constituting nearly half of all jobs. The workforce is relatively young, requiring transition policies that prioritize skills development and job placement. Men comprise the bulk share of employees in the coal mining industry, although female participation has risen over time. Coal mining industry jobs are relatively well paid, with the average coal miner wage surpassing that of the average formal sector worker, thus making income support for displaced workers financially burdensome. Wage inequality within the coal mining industry is lower than wage inequality within the broader formal sector economy. Thus, should coal miners transition from jobs in the relatively low inequality coal mining industry, to jobs in high inequality industries, then it is possible that overall inequality will rise.

• Ameliorating the Consequences of Coal Job Destruction - A Just Transition Policy Matrix Approach (October 2025)

Ensuring a just energy transition in South Africa requires supporting workers to absorb the negative shocks of structural change. Central to this is the design of a comprehensive social protection package for coal mining workers. This paper proposes the “just transition policy matrix” approach, which uses micro data to tailor policy responses to the needs of different groups of at-risk workers. 

Temporary income support dominates expenditure in all scenarios, followed by education and training. Existing policies can be leveraged to support displaced workers. Nonetheless, when applied to coal workers, funding gaps remain, requiring additional fiscal resources and implying a substantial rise in social protection spending.

The energy transition is a challenge and a necessity for Mexico’s economic transformation as, on the one hand, the country spends 7.6% of its GDP on fossil fuel subsidies and, on the other hand, in 2020 it was estimated that the economic impact of climate disaster increased by 202%. In order to achieve a successful energy transition and secure a sustainable growth path, Mexico needs to modernize its energy sector, reduce reliance on fossil fuels, and ensure sustainability. However, it is necessary to start from the territory, involving communities in the co-construction of resilience and the strengthening of local productive chains. Community and cooperative models play an essential role in promoting the creation of collective businesses managed in a democratic and solidarity-driven manner.

An example of just transition opportunities are energy cooperatives. They are a clear and promising model that involves local communities in the production, distribution and consumption of renewable energy, promoting decentralization and democratization of energy, especially in those territories historically and systematically excluded.

However, research conducted in Mexico during the first phase of the Research Facility on Inequalities showed low wealth sharing and limited social mobility in the country. In this context, it is necessary to address the just energy transition from an intergenerational social mobility approach and a social perspective to ensure benefits for the whole society. 

This work is also part of AFD's dialogue with the Mexican authorities on options for diversifying the economy and reducing inequalities.

Find out more about the Extension in Mexico

In partnership with the Centro de Estudios Espinosa Yglesias (CEEY) and in collaboration with the National Institute of the Social Economy (INAES), this research project aims to develop a conceptual and analytical research input for a better understanding of the role that renewable energy cooperatives can play in reducing inequality and increasing social mobility, and how they can be financed. 

This input will:

• Conceptualise the just energy transition approach in the area of existing structural inequalities;
• Make a diagnosis from the perspective of intergenerational social mobility, as well as from the perspective of social and solidarity economy, and its relevance in the framework of just transitions, in order to establish identification criteria, social selection and prioritisation of projects;
• Use this diagnostic to propose criteria for the identification and selection of projects that prioritise the populations with the greatest disadvantages of origin (with the least space for social mobility), given the requirement of «no losers» of the just transition;
• Review and articulate technical issues related to decentralised energy and distributed generation, given their importance in the social economy in the just energy transition;
• Review the current INAES projects related to the subject in order, where appropriate, to guide the construction of identification and selection criteria.  

The research team will first conduct an exhaustive review of literature focused on environmental justice, climate justice, social mobility applied to environmental justice and intergenerational environmental justice. The literature will be analysed from the perspective of the energy transition and the intersection of these issues.

Based on this review of literature, researchers will develop a conceptual framework to understand the just energy transition in the field of current structural inequalities. It will also explain how this conceptual framework can be relevant for public policy decision-making.

The research team will also identify information gaps and research needs, with a special focus on the study of just energy transitions.

You will find below the research paper related to this project: Just Energy Transition, Structural Inequities, and Social Mobility: The Case of Mexico

Download the publication