Randomised Control Trials (RCTs) have a narrow scope, restricted to basic intervention schemes. Experimental designs also display specific biases and political uses when implemented in the real world. Despite these limitations, the method has been advertised as the gold standard to evaluate development policies. This paper takes a political economy angle to explore this paradox. It argues that the success of RCTs is driven mainly by a new scientific business model based on a mix of simplicity and mathematical rigour, media and donor appeal, and academic and financial returns. This in turn meets current interests and preferences in the academic world and the donor community.
from the same collectionResearch documentCommitted emissions and the risk of stranded assets from power plants in Latin America and the Caribbeanpublished in October 2019Research documentThe economic trigger: Enabling gendered social inclusion processes and outcomes amidst poverty escapes in Niger and Malawipublished in October 2019Research documentReaching Brazil's Nationally Determined Contributions: An Assessment of the Key Transitions in Final Demand and Employmentpublished in October 2019Research documentpublished in October 2019Research documentpublished in October 2019Research documentpublished in June 2019