Randomised Control Trials (RCTs) have a narrow scope, restricted to basic intervention schemes. Experimental designs also display specific biases and political uses when implemented in the real world. Despite these limitations, the method has been advertised as the gold standard to evaluate development policies. This paper takes a political economy angle to explore this paradox. It argues that the success of RCTs is driven mainly by a new scientific business model based on a mix of simplicity and mathematical rigour, media and donor appeal, and academic and financial returns. This in turn meets current interests and preferences in the academic world and the donor community.
from the same collectionResearch documentLow-carbon Transition and Macroeconomic Vulnerabilities: A Multidimensional Approach in Tracing Vulnerabilities and its Application in the Case of Colombiapublished in July 2023Research documentGetting from Good Intentions to Effective Action: A Proposal for a Just Transition Partnering Implementation Model in South Africapublished in July 2023Research documentCounter-cyclical Responses: How Development Banks helped the Covid-19 Recovery, and Lessons for the Futurepublished in July 2023Research documentpublished in June 2023Research documentA scoping review of the vulnerability of Nigeria's coastland to sea-level rise and the contribution of land subsidencepublished in June 2023Research documentpublished in June 2023