There are several approaches to fragile states. The first, based on the crisis cycle, distinguishes between deteriorating countries, countries in prolonged crisis, countries emerging from crisis, and countries showing gradual improvement. The second, advocated by the United Kingdom’s Department for International Development (DFID), is based on the characteristics of the state, and more specifically on the combination of its capacity and its political will to resolve crises and ensure equitable distribution of resources to the entire population.
4.28 MB (pdf)
downloaded 1075 times
on the same regionResearch documentAnalysis of Multidimensional Inequalities in Central America and Dominican Republic, and a Strategy for Inequality Reductionpublished in November 2020Research documentpublished in November 2020Vidéopublished in April 2020Vidéopublished in February 2020Institutional documentpublished in December 2019Research documentCommitted emissions and the risk of stranded assets from power plants in Latin America and the Caribbeanpublished in October 2019
on the same topicResearch documentpublished in November 2020Research documentpublished in November 2020Research documentCollect more, spend better? Assessing the incidence of fiscal systems and public spending in three Francophone West African countriespublished in November 2020Research documentpublished in November 2020Research documentpublished in November 2020Research documentpublished in November 2020
from the same collectionEvaluation documentpublished in January 2020Evaluation documentEvaluation of the Second Objective of the Biodiversity Cross-cutting Intervention Framework (2013–2017)published in May 2019Evaluation documentEvaluation of the AFD “Protected Area” conservation and development intervention contributions (2000-2017). Synthesis of the final reportpublished in March 2019Evaluation documentpublished in February 2019Evaluation documentpublished in April 2018Evaluation documentpublished in February 2018