Climate change has become the most important global issue of our time and now occupies a key place on the global governance agenda. Recent attempts to create a concrete framework for mitigation have fallen short. This failure has been explored in a number of studies. These have mostly focused on the pursuit of a global deal through international negotiations, or on the domestic mitigation policies of Annex 1 states. However, large developing countries, such as China and Brazil, are now widely considered to be the vanguard of climate change policymaking , taking actions that are comparable to anything being done by Annex 1 states. The emergence of new climate leaders warrants a study of the trends in their domestic policies and policymaking. This report evaluates the approaches of four significant developing and emerging economies to climate change governance, describing both the evolution of institution building and policymaking processes, and analysing the political and economic drivers of change : China and Brazil, as they account for a growing percentage of global GHG emissions, and the smaller, Ethiopia and Tuvalu, as examples of those most vulnerable to its effects while bearing little or no responsibility for the problem. While the future of climate governance remains uncertain, it can be seen that climate governance is increasingly defined by the actions of developing , or non-Annex 1 states.
-
on the same region
Vidéopublished in September 2024Evaluation documentpublished in September 2024Vidéopublished in September 2024Research documentpublished in September 2024Research documentpublished in August 2024Research documentpublished in July 2024 -
on the same topic
Vidéopublished in September 2024Reviews and Activity Reportspublished in September 2024Research documentpublished in August 2024Research documentpublished in August 2024Vidéopublished in August 2024Institutional documentInfographicspublished in July 2024 -
from the same collection
Research documentpublished in July 2015Research documentpublished in May 2015Research documentpublished in February 2015Research documentpublished in February 2014Research documentpublished in July 2013Research documentpublished in April 2013