Social-protection schemes have become a popular form of government intervention in developing countries. The empirical evidence is still scant on their effectiveness in reducing within-household inequality and poverty. To this aim, we use data from the Young Lives cohort study, and evaluate the role played in it by three large-scale social-protection schemes i) the Productive Safety Net Program (PSNP) in Ethiopia, ii) the National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (NREGS) in India iii) the Juntos conditional cash transfer program in Peru. We find that these programs fail to reach all poor individuals since undernourished as even poor children are spread across the distribution of household per capita expenditure. Participating in the programs, however, has some positive impact. Program participant households do experience a reduction in child undernutrition once enrolled in the programs. At the same time, these programs are successful to divert resources from adults to children, and hence to reduce within-household inequality.
-
on the same region
Vidéopublished in February 2025Research documentpublished in January 2025Vidéopublished in September 2024Research documentpublished in July 2024Vidéopublished in July 2024Research documentpublished in January 2024 -
on the same topic
Vidéopublished in April 2025Research documentpublished in March 2025Vidéopublished in March 2025Research documentpublished in March 2025Research documentpublished in February 2025Vidéopublished in February 2025 -
in the same collection
Research documentpublished in April 2025Research documentpublished in March 2025Research documentpublished in February 2025Research documentpublished in February 2025Research documentpublished in January 2025Research documentpublished in January 2025